India Suspends Turkish Firm’s Airport Security Clearance: National Security Concerns Cited
The Delhi High Court is currently reviewing a case brought by the Turkish company Celebi Airport Services India Pvt Ltd after the Indian government revoked its security clearance. The government argues that the decision was made in the best interest of national security based on intelligence reports suggesting potential risks associated with Celebi continuing its ground handling operations at nine airports across India.
Government Cites Intelligence and Security Threats
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the government, emphasized the interconnectedness of civil aviation and national security. He shared confidential intelligence inputs with the court, stating that disclosing them publicly would jeopardize national interests and security. Mehta emphasized that in matters of national security, a risk-averse approach is essential.
Company Challenges Revocation
Celebi, represented by Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, refuted the government’s claims, asserting that the company has operated in India for 17 years with 14,000 employees and has always acted professionally and responsibly. Rohatgi argued that the revocation was based on public perception rather than concrete evidence, pointing out that Celebi is an Indian company with Indian employees and has no ties to any rogue activities.
He further stressed that the government’s decision lacked due process, denying Celebi a hearing or a clear explanation for the revocation.
Court Considers Implications
Justice Sachin Datta questioned the legal grounds for the government’s decision and whether such actions were subject to judicial review. He also raised concerns about the necessity of prior notice to Celebi before revoking its security clearance. The court has scheduled the next hearing for May 21 to further examine these legal and procedural aspects.
The security clearance revocation came shortly after Turkey expressed support for Pakistan and condemned India’s airstrikes against terrorist camps in the region, adding a layer of geopolitical complexity to the case.
